Well,
needless to say, I found the verdict in the case of the State of Florida vs
George Zimmerman to be repulsive, although by no means surprising. I’m still
trying to figure out how it can reasonably occur that a 17 year old kid coming
home from the store is profiled, stalked and shot dead by a self-revealed racist
with a history of physical violence and nobody is held to
account for it. I am saddened and disappointed and, of course, angered and my
anger and sense of frustration are exacerbated by the large numbers of my
fellow citizens who take the position that justice has been done and we can all
sleep well at night again.
It is not my intention to analyze the legal merits
of the prosecution or defense of the case and it is not my intention to impugn the
character or the intelligence of the jury. It is not my intention to question
the efficacy of our legal system or of any of the specific decisions or actions
of that system made or taken during the course of the trial. I was not present
during the trial and cannot evaluate the quality of the presentation of the
evidence or the manner in which it may have been refuted, and I did not participate
in the jury deliberations and cannot assess the intent or substance of those
deliberations. I do not know if it was proven that Mr. Zimmerman was guilty beyond
all reasonable doubt of the charges brought against him, but I do know Mr.
Zimmerman is guilty of being an avatar of the sick paranoia and cult of hatred
and violence that so many people promote as a virtue in 21st Century
America.
America has always been a racist nation. We were
born through the genocide of countless millions of aboriginal peoples and built
upon the violently extracted sweat of African slaves. These actions required us
to value the lives and rights of certain classes of people less than our own. The
extent to which these facts of our history are diminished or denied has continually
astounded me, and the righteous justification that allows us to absolve
ourselves of moral culpability for such things contributes to the creation of
people like George Zimmerman who feel that their assumptions about certain
types of people are evidence of clear and present danger that warrant pre-emptive
action. Racism is by no means dead in modern America, and the very argument
that Mr. Zimmerman’s fears were reasonable because “young black guys commit all
the crimes” is sterling evidence of that.
What really drives my dismay about this verdict is
more deeply personal, though. I have two sons, one who will be 21 in a few
months and another who will be eighteen in a couple of weeks. I love them and
fear for their welfare a good deal more than my words or deeds generally
indicate. They have not always followed the narrow path and I can easily see either
of them wandering around somewhere unfamiliar at an unusual time and being
confronted by a resident suspicious of their presence. I can also see the brashness
of youth resulting in an uncooperative attitude which is then viewed as
confirmation of suspicion and an escalating exchange where both parties vent
their frustrations; frustrations over perceived danger on one hand, and the
frustration of not being able to pass unmolested down a public street on the
other. Such encounters usually result only in harsh words, or, at worse, the
police being summoned to intervene, but if a person like George Zimmerman is
introduced into the mix, I might be grieving the death of a child who was
guilty only of standing up for himself and not being experienced enough to know
how dangerous that can sometimes be.
On the night of February 26, 2012 George Zimmerman
observed a person legally walking in his neighborhood that he thought was suspicious.
He thought he was suspicious because he was the same race and age of persons
who were thought to have committed property crimes in the neighborhood. George
Zimmerman armed himself with a handgun and followed the “suspect” in his car. At
some point he got out of his car and confronted the individual. Some sort of
exchange ensued and an unarmed Travon Martin was shot dead. Whether George
Zimmerman planned to shoot anyone is impossible to say; it is clear he prepared
himself to so. The jury says there was no crime, but the jury can only judge
the guilt of an individual, not a society, and crime and sin are not always the
same thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment